Featured
Latest
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Forum 141

[Closed] Cossor 54 Electrostatic TV Re-birth

46 Posts
12 Users
0 Likes
6,880 Views
Brian Cuff
(@briancuff)
Posts: 2063
Member Rest in Peace
Topic starter
 

That's a very good idea Jeffrey. I have a 3.5kV bench supply which I can try - I wish I was clever, it must be all those fishy oils!

Forum Memorial

 
Posted : 11/03/2013 2:03 pm
Brian Cuff
(@briancuff)
Posts: 2063
Member Rest in Peace
Topic starter
 

I ran the set with the external EHT generator and the hum has gone!!! Thanks for the nudge, Jeffery. I had thought about EHT smoothing as mentioned in a previous post but I thought it was not easy to check. How wrong I was - it was very easy and it led me to finding the real problem - the EHT smoothing cap was not connected - I had not connected it after installing the rear tag board which carries all the EHT components except the reservoir and smoothing caps. Here is a picture of test card C now:

As you can see, there is still line non-linearity but the line cogging has gone! Strange sets, these electrostatic models. The interaction between EHT and other circuits is much greater but I suppose that that is because, unlike magnetic sets, there is a firm connection between EHT and HT, not just via the CRT electron beam.

The shifted image can be corrected by the adjustable magnets mounted on the inside of the cabinet sides.

This is how the set looks now - very nearly finished!!

PS Excuse the yoghurt pot!

Forum Memorial

 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:40 pm
Till Eulenspiegel
(@till)
Posts: 4947
Famed Member Registered
 

Hi Brian,
Considering the non linearity of the line scan. The picture is slightly compressed on the right side indicating the sawtooth slows up and the end. The ramp forming capacitor C29 is of a very small value I believe, 10pF? The trouble with this circuit even stray capacitances are going to have an influence on the shape of the waveform. Perhaps the capacitor could be reduced by a fraction, it might just sharpen up the waveform.
Cossor got away with only supplying one deflector plate with 500V p-p waveform, the other deflector plate has only DC applied to it. How about a non metalised MS-PEN?

Till Eulenspiegel.

 
Posted : 14/03/2013 12:54 pm
Brian Cuff
(@briancuff)
Posts: 2063
Member Rest in Peace
Topic starter
 

Hmm. I understand what you are saying, Till. The value as given is 20pf but still it's in the realms of strays especially with the older 4V valves. I will make a note of your very good suggestion and try a reduction - say to 15pf but not this week. I have boxed the 54 and am getting to grips with the TSC113, a 15" set - not much of a change from 7"! The EHT used for the 15" CRT is 12kV, mains derived 8)) 8)) so I will be extremely careful with that one!

Forum Memorial

 
Posted : 14/03/2013 6:33 pm
Anonymous
(@anonymous)
Posts: 16868
Group Deactivated Account
 

I think the Visual IF should be about 3-6 mHz and the Aural IF is 2.5 mHz. At least that is how I aligned my set.

 
Posted : 15/03/2013 1:11 pm
Brian Cuff
(@briancuff)
Posts: 2063
Member Rest in Peace
Topic starter
 

I agree Steve. I used 2.5MHz and 3-6MHz as you have suggested. The bandwidth isn't that great, the 2MHz bars are just about discernible but on such a small CRT, that's plenty for a reasonable picture.

Forum Memorial

 
Posted : 15/03/2013 2:08 pm
Page 3 / 3
Share: